Actually, I have a lot of questions for the NFL. Like why are there teams in Jacksonville and Tennessee but no team in Los Angeles? Or why do two New York teams play in New Jersey? Or why haven't they castrated the Roethlisbozo yet? Come to think of it, I don't know that they haven't done that last one.
So many questions, but the one that's been bothering me lately is this one. Why does the NFL bother advertising? Did you know football is back? I do, because the TV told me so, over and over again. It must be costing them millions in advertising. Why bother?
Does the NFL think there are sports fans all over America who just haven't heard about this whole pro football thing? Do they think that if they just get the word out, maybe one day their little league will be popular? Or does the NFL think we forgot which day of the week football happens? There has to be something better they can do with that money, like paying Brett Favre to go away forever.
This "football is back" ad campaign makes it seem like the lock-out lasted for three years. Nobody cares about the lock-out, we didn't miss anything except the stupid hall of fame game. Stop trying to convince me to watch football. Trust me, I'm already there. Just leave me alone and I'll see you on Sunday.
My pre-season picks were pretty solid last year. I nailed the NFC and Superbowl champion Packers. As for the AFC, I didn't even have Pittsburgh in the playoffs, but I'm taking a mulligan on that one. I knew the Steelers would be good, I just refused to pick the Bozo to win anything, a tradition I'll be continuing this year...
AFC playoff teams
1) New England
2) San Diego
3) Baltimore
4) Houston
5) New York
6) Cleveland
AFC playoff results
Baltimore over Cleveland (huge!)
New York over Houston
San Diego over Baltimore (everyone will pick Baltimore here)
New York over New England (again)
San Diego over New York
A Thought for Every AFC Team
Denver: There's no amount of money I wouldn't be willing to pay the Denver Broncos if they let me go the whole season without hearing about Tim Tebow.
San Diego: I like the Chargers a lot this year. If Bob Sanders can stay healthy, this could finally be their year. That sounds like a big if, but Indianapolis always seems to be plagued with injuries, maybe it wasn't Bob's fault.
Cleveland and Pittsburgh: Why Cleveland? I'm all in on Colt McCoy and all out on the Steelers. Aside from hating the Bozo, Rashard Mendenhall had something like 700 touches last year. He may disintegrate on the field at some point this season.
Indianapolis: Any season that starts with Kerry Collins is pretty much guaranteed to end in disappointment.
Buffalo: "Ladies and Gentleman. With the first pick in the 2012 NFL draft, the Buffalo Bills select Andrew Luck, quarterback from Stanford University"
Kansas City: Opposing defenses should be terrified of Jamaal Charles, but they should feel exactly the opposite about Matt Cassel.
Miami: I think the Heat can be better in their second season togeth...what? Dolphins? There's still a football team in Miami?
Cincinnati: It's so nice to have the Bengals back. It's like a warm security blanket of football atrocity.
Houston: No defense + lots of offensive weapons surrounding a somewhat inconsistent quarterback = always fun to watch. They have to make the playoffs one of these years, right?
Oakland: At least they have Nnamdi...oh wait...crap!
New England: It's hard to pick against New England, but I'm at the point where I need to see them win a playoff game again before I can get back on board.
Tennessee: As much as Chris Johnson is the man, I'm not counting on a guy who 1) skipped all of training camp and 2) is smaller than I am to carry an otherwise forgettable team to the playoffs.
Baltimore: I really don't like watching the Ravens. I got bored just trying to think of something to write here.
Jacksonville: Los Angeles is really nice this time of year...or, for that matter, any time of year.
New York: I would also pay almost any amount of money to anyone who could get Rex Ryan to shut up for two straight weeks. Now let's go eat a goddamn snack!
NFC playoff teams
1) Green Bay
2) Atlanta
3) Philadelphia
4) San Francisco
5) New Orleans
6) Detroit
NFC playoff results
Detroit over Philly (not betting on Vick getting to the end of the season in one piece)
New Orleans over San Francisco
Green Bay over Detroit
Atlanta over New Orleans (really good game)
Green Bay over Atlanta (really REALLY good game, but Atlanta can't win in Green Bay in January)
A Thought for Every NFC Team
Detroit: I'm picking the Lions because I like them, but also because I'm afraid Ndamukong Suh is capable of finding everyone in America who didn't pick the Lions to make the playoffs and beating them all to death.
Green Bay: Here's why I like the Packers to repeat in the NFC. Last year they won the superbowl, but they did it as a 6 seed, and they did it without some key players. So now you have a defending champ that didn't have a dominant season, didn't get a home playoff game and has some players returning who didn't participate in the championship run. I'm more willing to bet on a dominant 14-2 season from Green Bay than a complacent 8-8.
Washington: I'm not one of those people who says Redskins is an offensive name. I should probably clarify that. I'm not saying it isn't offensive, it probably is, I just don't care. On a related note, if you have to watch Washington play this season, chances are you'll be pretty offended.
Tampa Bay: Much like the city of Tampa Bay itself, The Bucs' defense doesn't really exist.
St. Louis: I don't know why everyone likes the Rams so much. They only won 7 games last year, and look at who they beat. Calm down everybody.
New York: Something about the Giants this year just screams 8-8.
New Orleans: My fantasy team is counting on a breakout season from Jimmy Graham. So...get on that Drew Brees.
Chicago: No team did more with less last year than Chicago. This year, I predict no team will do less with less.
Philadelphia: I think people are forgetting that Philadelphia's defense was awful last year. And even though Nnamdi is great, the Raiders were awful pretty much the whole time he was there. I guess I'm saying I'm not 100% sold on Philly.
Atlanta: I almost picked Atlanta to win the NFC. I think the South is too tough for them to get a 1 seed and home field in the playoffs, and that's the only reason I think they lose in the championship game.
Minnesota: I think Minnesota's success this season will mostly depend on whether or not the Favre exorcism really worked.
Dallas: Last year I picked Dallas to win the East, and they started the season 1-7. As a great Texan once said, "Fool me once, shame on...shame on you. Fool me...you can't get fooled again."
Arizona: A few too many eggs in the Kevin Kolb basket for my liking. Look what happened to Donovan McNabb after he left Philly. I'm not saying they're the same quarterback, I'm just saying it may be easier to put up good numbers when you're throwing the ball 97% of the time and your running backs are basically props.
Carolina: Cam Newton still has to convince me that he isn't just a more likable JaMarcus Russell.
Seattle: Boooooooooooo!!! (I've actually always liked Tarvaris Jackson, but still)
San Francisco: Speaking of getting fooled again. Listen, they play in an awful division that I think might somehow be even worse this year, Patrick Willis is still a monster and...well that's all I can think of. But much like the Texans, this has to happen one of these years, right?
Superbowl Pick
In one of the most fun superbowls I'll ever see, Chargers 34, Packers 28.
Thursday, September 8, 2011
I Have a Question for the NFL
Friday, January 28, 2011
One Super Prediction
Before I get to what happens next Sunday, here are some things I learned from the championship games.
The Jets offense is a catastrophe. Actually, I didn't learn that, it's been that way as long as I can remember. Good plays always look like a coincidence, they're constantly disorganized, I always know what they're running next. They need to fire (and possibly incarcerate) everyone who has ever coached offense for that team and start from scratch.
I'm so tired of hearing about the Roethlisbozo. If the Steeler defense somehow won them a game in which The Bozo went 1 for 20 for 12 yards with 5 interceptions, the sports media would spend the next week telling me how that one completion came at the perfect time and how The Bozo always knows when to step up. I thought Tebow was the new Favre, maybe I was wrong.
The internet has officially ruined sports media too. Jay Cutler's knee injury, which basically became the sports equivalent of Watergate for a day and a half, proved that sports journalism has become the same as every other kind of journalism - just tell everyone what famous people are tweeting and let the magic happen.
Alright, let's get on with it. As usual, for someone who watched something like 200 hours of football this season, I seem to have learned very little. For gambling purposes, anything you read here should be quickly forgotten.
First Impression:
My very first thought for a pick was this. If the Bozo can manage to not assault anyone between now and the superbowl, than I like the Steelers. If he's in custody by the time next Sunday rolls around, I like Green Bay. So really, my first instinct was, it's a toss up.
Offenses - Passing Game:
Clear advantage to Green Bay. Better QB, better wide-outs, better protection. The Bozo can probably hit one deep ball to Mike Wallace at some point, but Rodgers can hit one to Greg Jennings and another to James Jones. Rodgers is also more accurate and less prone to mistakes, while The Bozo is less accurate and more prone to felonies.
Offenses - Running Game:
The Packers can't run the ball at all, which is handy because you can't run against Pittsburgh anyway. I actually think they can turn this weakness into a strength, because they know they can't run and they won't spend the first half banging their heads against the wall trying, like, say, a certain team from New Jersey recently did. Pittsburgh has a clear running advantage, but with their O-line pretty banged up, I'm not sure how much they can use it.
Defenses:
I have a feeling we're going to spend the next week hearing about how this game is about the Green Bay offense vs. the Pittsburgh defense. You wanna know a secret? The Green Bay defense is just as good as Pittsburgh's. The Packers only gave up 8 more points this season than Pittsburgh did, they get great pressure, they force turnovers and they're generally difficult to play against.
On the other hand, I'm not sure the Steeler D is quite as dominant as people want them to be. Bad first half against Baltimore, bad second half against the Jets, destroyed by New England earlier in the season. When I look at their schedule, I'm not blown away by who they really held down. Holding teams like Oakland and Carolina to 3 points doesn't really knock my socks off.
I'm calling the defensive battle a draw.
Quarterback Ability to (allegedly) Sexually Assault People:
Clear advantage to Pittsburgh here. Aaron Rodgers has shown no aptitude in this area. This might turn out to be useful. During the game, The Bozo will try to throw touchdowns on the Green Bay defense, and they'll say "no, no, don't throw touchdowns on us", and they'll try to stop him, but he'll keep trying anyway. After the game, he'll say they secretly wanted him to throw touchdowns on him.
Prediction:
I'm actually not sure this game will be that close. Maybe it's just wishful thinking and how much I dislike The Bozo. Maybe I spent too much time watching the Packers this season because they had my fantasy D and top WR. Whatever the reasons, Green Bay just kind of looks like a better team to me. Plus, I think playing inside really favors the Packers, I'm not sure I'd like them so much if there wasn't a roof on this game.
Packers 30, Steelers 13.
Thursday, April 22, 2010
Re-Mixed Bag
There's a lot going on in the sports world these days, but nothing I feel like writing a whole lot about. So, let's try another round of made-up questions from made-up readers.
Q: You're always going on and on about how great hockey is, so how come no hockey playoff picks? - Homer, Springfield.
A: Honestly, I'm just bitter about not being able to see the playoffs on TV. If I had made picks, I would have picked the Blackhawks over the Sabres in six. I like Buffalo because they've got the best goaltender. As for Chicago, I watched almost every Olympic hockey game. Jonathan Toews and Patrick Kane were the two best non-goaltenders in that tournament. They both play in Chicago.
Q: Any thoughts on Sam Bradford going number one in the NFL draft yesterday? - George J., the future.
A: I can't believe the Rams didn't take Ndamukong Suh. That's going to wind up being a HUGE mistake, an Oden/Durant level mistake. If you don't believe me, just ask the pile of bodies Suh left on the field after every Nebraska game last year. That dude is a monster, QB's in the NFC North better starting running now.
PS...I demand that Fox use Johnny Cash's A Boy Named Sue at least once during every Lions' game next year. I demand it.
PPS...yes, Greg Oden is the new Sam Bowie. Congratulations to Portland for making the exact same mistake twice. That really takes...umm...what's the oppostive of savvy.
Q: The Denver Broncos took Tim Tebow with the 25th pick in the NFL draft. Do you think that was a bad idea? - Eric, South Park, CO.
A: Bad idea? Trying to hook up with a stripper is a bad idea. Driving to the store to get cigarettes when you're so drunk that you want cigarettes even though you don't smoke is a bad idea. Tim Tebow in the first round was a terrible idea. Denver just blew a 1st round pick on a guy that will never be a starting quarterback in the NFL. Ever. Congratulations Broncos fans, I hope you enjoy the white Tommy Frazier, or as he was formerly known, Eric Crouch.
Q: If your favorite NFL team needed a QB, would you want them to give up some high draft picks for Ben Roethlisberger? - Peter, Quahog, RI.
A: Honestly, no. I'm not usually someone who cares about character, but the Roethlisbozo is a meat-head frat boy who doesn't appear to have the ability or the inclination to grow up. It's not like this is his first stupid incident. I have no confidence that this will be his last conduct suspension, so I'd stay away.
Q: You're a New York guy. Can you give me a good reason Mets' fans shouldn't all kill themselves? - Lion-o, ummm, I don't know where the Thundercats were from, my childhood?
A: Actually, I can, no fooling. Mike Pelfrey. I've seen every Pelfrey start this year, and this doesn't look like a hot start or a fluke to me. Pelfrey looks to be in total control out there, he looks like he figured something out. I think he'll finish the year with an ERA right around 3 and 15-18 wins. Considering how young he is, I think that's enough for Mets' fans to put down the cyanide. Come on, put it down. There you go.
Q: After almost completely leaving him out of all of your baseball previews, what are your thoughts about Jason Heyward? - Stan, Langley Falls, VA.
A: He's like a cross between Barry Bonds, Jesus and Superman. Seriously though, I'm pretty impressed. I can't wait for him to become a Yankee. Maybe we should trade Nick Swisher now just to make room.
Q: What's the most surprising thing about the baseball season so far? - Stewie, Quahog, RI.
I'd have to say it's the Red Sox. They really look awful. It's early, and Boston has the pieces to add players if they need to, but Tampa and the Yankees both look like 100-win teams. Boston can't afford to get too far back. If the Sox can't get it going, we could see the rare May trade.
Q: You picked the Washington Wizards to make it to the second round of the NBA playoffs. Is that the stupidest thing you've ever said? - Stan, South Park, CO.
A: I may have said something stupider at some point in my life, but it has to be the stupidest thing I've ever put in writing. In my defense, many players who started the year in Washington have a solid chance of going to the second round, maybe even further.
Q: Any thoughts on the Masters? - Pinky and the Brain, some kind of science lab.
A: I was rooting for Tiger for four days, right up until Phil won and hugged his wife and I remembered that Mickelson stuck by his wife when she got cancer and Tiger had sex with anything that moved. I guess what I'm saying is, hooray for Phil!
Q: Now that the playoffs have started, how are you feeling about your NBA picks? - Cleveland, Stoolbend, VA.
A: Pretty good. If you take out my previously mentioned disastrous Wizards prediction, I actually did a decent job, including being dead on about the Durants giving the Lakers a hard time in a first round series. I still like my Spurs-Magic finals, too.
I know the Spurs are a 7 seed, but I think they can roll past the Mavs and whoever they get in round two. I know the Lakers are still the favorite, but I've watched all three of their playoff games, something just looks off. The Spurs have the look of a team that's putting it together at the right time.
Then there's the Magic. I'd love to see the Bulls find a way to take four games from Cleveland, but it's probably not going to happen. I'm sure we're heading for the inevitable Magic-Cavs conference final. Betting on Vince Carter is basically like playing a slot machine, but I'm sticking with my pick. Magic over the Hype Kings in six.